Wednesday, April 23, 2014

A to Z Challenge: T is for Taylor

This year, I'm participating in the insane awesome A to Z blogging challenge, which entails posting EVERY SINGLE DAY during the month of April, except for Sundays. Each day's theme corresponds to a different day of the alphabet: 26 days, 26 posts. I'll be blogging each day this month on some aspect of my current work in progress (WIP).

T is for Taylor

I'll preface today's post by asking you to forgive the strange grammar I'm going to use, here. I explained this at length back in November, but Taylor's gender is never revealed in the book - and indeed, I've made no decision about it one way or the other, either. I wanted to explore whether or not souls have gender, and what it means to love, and I wondered if love between souls could transcend gender. I did notice that every commenter so far has assumed that Taylor is a man, but I'm guessing that's because the love interest is a woman; if there are other reasons, though, I would love to hear them!

This decision, unfortunately, makes it not so easy to talk about Taylor in the third person...which is of course why this lifetime is told in the first person, from Taylor's own POV.

At any rate, as you all know by now, Taylor is a sheep farmer in Australia in the 1950s or 60s. Taylor lives alone, and has for many, many years; before Nat arrives, Taylor's only company were the sheep, and the neighbors, who live out of eye- and earshot, and only visit occasionally. This might sound lonely, but Taylor is a naturally solitary person, and loves this stable, predictable life. Yes, Taylor is of course our Rule Abider soul.

Needless to say, Nat comes in to this quiet life like, well, forgive the Miley Cyrus reference, but, a wrecking ball. Against Taylor's better judgement, they begin a no-strings-attached affair that should be uncomplicated and easy, and quickly becomes anything but, as Taylor realizes that not having anyone to love doesn't mean that the heart stops working altogether. It just hibernates for a while, until someone comes along and wakes it up, and then the heart finds that it's wide awake and ravenously hungry.

Things go well for a little while, until, of course, they don't. We enter their story as readers after things have gone south: Nat's gone for good - at least, that's what she said - and Taylor is desperate to find her. I'll let Taylor tell you a tiny bit about it (and once again, I'm making all of the sheep farming stuff up until I can research it, and correct it):
It all started because I was crazy enough to hire a local kid as a favor to an old friend. If I’d listened to myself, I never would have let the kid on the farm, and then when Nat came knocking I wouldn't have had a job for her, and she would have left. And that would have been the end of it. I wouldn't be here in my truck, leaving my flock at the height of the season to search for a ghost. 
But I didn't listen to myself; that was my first mistake. I ignored the kid's skinny arms and long hair, and gave him a chance. Holding sheep for shearing is no joke; a full-grown ewe can weigh more than a teenage boy, and will buck and kick and blow that boy’s shins out if he’s not careful. The kid took one look at the jostling crowd of dirty white backs, and did a runner. And left me short-handed with one thousand head of sheep to hold, shear, and cut loose. Bloody idiot. Me, that is, not the kid. 
I’m thinking about all of this because I have more time right now, sitting in my truck, than any person should have. We’re not made for driving around the country, scouring the grass for a shadow. At least, I’m not. Nat's different. In every way I can think of.

35 comments:

  1. ooooh-a twist-Taylor is gender unspecified-maybe he/she is not sure due to time travel. I like how he/she is still thinking of Nat even with all the work. The scene is very descriptive-love it

    ReplyDelete
  2. Uncomplicated, yet complicated. You really got the psychology down on these characters. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can't stop thinking about Taylor being a man! :) Great writing, today.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I keep learning about this book you're working on, but I realised I have no idea how close to being done you are -- how close are you? LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Erm, not close at all, unfortunately. I have sooooo much research to do... sigh!

      Delete
    2. Well, it sounds like you have a pretty solid idea of what you want to write, I feel like once you're done the research the actual writing may come quickly for you. Relatively speaking. LOL

      Delete
  5. A psychic once told me that I and my husband had been together through many incarnations, always as spouses, but that sometimes we switched genders . . . And that made perfect sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Okay, I admit it. I thought Taylor was a dude. A manly dude at that. I enjoyed this glimpse on the farm again. It reminded me of when we met Nat. Coincidence? I think not!

    Elsie
    AJ's wHooligan in the A-Z Challenge

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unique twist. But I loved reading through this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I pictured Taylor as male (tough and probably 30-40 years old). I think mostly because of context and stereotypes. You don't typically see a woman running a farm by herself in my general area (though I have no idea if that's really common in Australia, but since I know nothing about Australia, I just relate it to what I do know in my mind). I think "The curve of her breasts under her shirt" line also made me think guy. Still love it either way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally fair. Thanks for the details, Loni, I really appreciate it! I know what I'm trying to get across, but I never know how successful I am. This really helps!

      Delete
  9. Go get 'er, Taylor! It's odd, I knew Taylor was the gender non-specified, but oddly I thought of her as a her while reading the previous excerpts posted during this challenge, but in this one I thought of him as a him. I guess that means you're doing a great job of keeping the gender mysterious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope, not odd at all :) My hope is that people will go back and forth as they read - that sometimes Taylor will seem like a man, and sometimes like a woman. Thanks for telling me, Nicki!

      Delete
  10. I love that your character has no gender. I wrote a series of shorts in which the I narrator was never named or assigned a gender, and it was fascinating to hear how different readers interpreted the stories.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I really think the genderless issue you're using is completely fascinating. I'll admit I associate sheep herding and sheering with males some because I have a grandfather who did it, but I liked re-reading the passage imagining the narrator as female :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's got to be tough to write a character without referring to gender.

    And if you want a more engaging way to research sheep farming than reading online Wiki articles, I'd recommend reading The Welsh Girl. It's a novel set in northern Wales in WWII, but it also gives some beautiful details about sheep farming. Just a suggestion. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I DO want better resources! Thanks so much! I will totally check it out.

      Delete
  13. Tough to write a genderless character like that. Would be interesting to see what gender most people assume the character is.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Intriguing! I couldn't tell from your writing, But, I admit, had I not read your intro and known the MC was written intentionally genderless, I would have assumed that Taylor was a man.

    Your writing is very fluid. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  15. When I read last Wednesday's entry, I remembered you talking about a character with no given gender, and from the way you wrote Taylor in that, I figured that was it. And after reading this, I still don't know what to think one way or another, but I don't think it matters. It's a really interesting way to see a character.

    Also, this hit me a lot harder than it probably should: "...not having anyone to love doesn't mean that the heart stops working altogether. It just hibernates for a while, until someone comes along and wakes it up, and then the heart finds that it's wide awake and ravenously hungry."
    -_-

    ReplyDelete
  16. Have you read David Levithan's EVERYDAY? He has a fascinating take on soul gender in the story.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I can honestly tell you that I had a feeling Taylor may not be male.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Many times favors don't work out.

    I'm enjoying your snippets in these posts.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hard to believe you've made it all the way to "T." I'm barely keeping up with one post a week. My hats off to you!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I pictured Taylor as a man, but it certainly would add a different twist if (she) wasn't!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I've read that book written by the ex-wife of the real 'Crocodile Dundee', and with that knowledge, Taylor could easily be a woman. ...looking for the title of that book right now...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.amazon.com/Outback-Heart-Joanne-van-Os/dp/1743160542

      Delete
  22. Your question about whether a soul can have gender fascinates me.
    But I read Taylor as a man, perhaps because back in the 50's and 60's gender-neutral names were very uncommon, and yes, Taylor's attraction to Nat read as a man as well. Would Nat necessarily respond to a woman's overtures? I don't know, but I love all the questions your story raises. :)
    Good stuff!

    Kirsten @ A Scenic Route

    ReplyDelete
  23. I love the question you pose of souls having genders. Society is so caught up in the stereotypes genders play in life, but at our core, does gender matter? The excerpt you shared was interesting and well written!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Genderless souls -- very cool concept. And probably close to the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Wow how very cool! And tough to do! Loved the voice in this.

    ReplyDelete